Primary field: Microeconometrics, Causal Inference.
Secondary fields: Applied Microeconomics.
Instrumental Variables with Multiple Time Periods (Job Market Paper).
You can find me talking briefly about the paper here!
Abstract: Difference-in-Differences (DiD) is a popular method used to evaluate the effect of a treatment that exploits variation in treatment status that comes from the exposure to a shock, usually in the form of a policy change. When there is imperfect compliance towards the shock, the usual DiD estimand fails to recover relevant causal parameters. This article presents an identification strategy in DiD settings with imperfect compliance that identifies Marginal treatment effects (MTE). We show how to combine and modify standard instrumental variables (IV) and DiD assumptions to identify treatment effects in DiD settings where individuals enter into treatment with at least partial knowledge of their unobservable gains. We propose two estimators for the MTE that are consistent under different assumptions regarding the functional form of potential outcomes and prove their asymptotic normality. Furthermore, we derive an estimator for the local average treatment effect (LATE) that is robust to misspecification of the MTE model. We assert the desirable finite-sample properties through simulation studies of a linear MTE model. Finally, we use our results to investigate heterogeneity in the returns to primary education attendance in Indonesia. We find a pattern of reserve selection gains in the returns of primary education. Individuals with a higher distaste for enrolling in primary education have positive returns, while individuals with a lower distaste may have a negative return to primary education.
Breakdown Analysis for Instrumental Variables with Binary Outcomes.
Abstract: How much can negative attitudes towards women affect voting for a female candidate on a major election? We measure gender animus by calculating a proxy based on Google search queries that include gender-charged language. Such approach likely elicits socially sensitive attitudes by limiting the concern of social censoring, circumventing usual difficulties associated with survey-based measurements. We compare the proxy to Hillary Clinton's vote share in the presidential election of 2016, controlling for the vote share of the previous Democratic presidential candidate, Barack Obama. Our results indicate that a one standard deviation increase in our proxy is associated with a 2 percentage points relative loss for Hillary and suggest that online-based observable behavior can be useful for measuring different kinds of hard-to-measure social attitudes.